Start your free two-week trial of BWS+ here:
Can you actually target belly fat? For 60 days, we put the most popular belly fat workout advice to the test — running a real experiment on how to lose belly fat using exercises to lose belly fat like targeted ab training, and measuring every result with MRI, one of the most precise ways to track changes in fat and muscle. If you’ve ever wondered whether belly fat loss exercise routines actually work, this is the clearest answer we could produce.
The idea comes from newer spot reduction research suggesting that training a specific muscle may increase blood flow and fat mobilization around that area. But releasing fat from storage is only half the equation. If your body doesn’t actually burn that fat afterward, it can simply be stored again. That’s why the protocol combined moderate-intensity cardio with direct ab training, rather than relying on crunches alone.
The experiment followed Dennis and Vicky, both active but struggling with belly fat covering their abs. Dennis started at 17.5% total body fat, with his belly at 16%. Vicky started at 31.8% total body fat, with her belly at 24.7%. To track their results more accurately than progress photos, we used MRI to measure fat thickness across the upper, middle, and lower belly, along with ab muscle size.
For the first 30 days, Dennis and Vicky followed a plan based closely on the 2023 spot reduction study: 25 minutes of moderate-intensity cardio followed immediately by direct ab training every other day. This belly fat workout included weighted crunches for the upper abs and reverse crunches for the lower abs. Diet was not changed, matching the original study design. The major difference was that Dennis continued his usual lifting routine, while Vicky was not weight training.
Visually, Phase 1 looked promising at first. Dennis felt like his abs were becoming more visible, and Vicky noticed more upper-ab definition. But lighting, posing, and day-to-day changes can make progress photos misleading. That’s why the MRI data mattered.
After 30 days, Dennis gained about half a pound while dropping from 17.5% to 17% body fat. But his belly fat barely changed, dropping by only about 0.3%. Most of his fat loss came from areas like his arms and hips. Vicky lost 5 pounds, but 60% of that weight came from lean mass and only 40% came from fat. Her body fat percentage moved from 31.8% to 31.5%. Her upper belly did lose fat, but across her whole body, the belly fat reduction was proportional to fat loss in other areas. In other words, the exercises to lose belly fat that we tested didn’t pull fat specifically from the belly.
The most interesting Phase 1 result was ab growth. Dennis’ abs grew by about 20% on average, and Vicky’s abs grew by about 15%, even though she lost muscle in every other muscle group. This may explain why both looked more defined under the right lighting.
For Phase 2, we threw out the spot reduction protocol completely. No cardio. No direct ab training. Instead, Dennis and Vicky focused on tracking calories and strength training. Vicky started a 3-day full-body workout plan, while Dennis followed a 4-day upper/lower split.
Cardio was removed for a reason. After cardio, people often eat more or move less without realizing it, which can reduce the expected fat loss. That doesn’t mean cardio is bad — it has real health benefits when used correctly — but in this experiment, diet and lifting were tested independently.
The difference was dramatic. In Phase 2, Vicky’s body fat dropped from 31.5% to 27.5%, and she gained almost 3 pounds of lean mass while losing weight. Her belly fat dropped by an average of 30%, including a major drop in her lower belly fat, which had not changed in Phase 1. Dennis lost 6 pounds, dropped to 14.4% body fat, and reduced his belly fat by an average of 26.3%.
There was one tradeoff: without direct ab training, Dennis’ abs shrank by about 16%, almost back to where they were before the experiment. Vicky’s abs mostly maintained their new size, likely because she was a beginner and full-body strength training gave her enough indirect ab stimulus. So while diet and lifting clearly beat the spot reduction protocol for belly fat loss and overall body composition, direct ab training still helped build the abs themselves.
The final takeaway on how to lose belly fat: based on this 60-day MRI experiment, trying to target belly fat directly did not work better than regular fat loss. The best belly fat loss exercise approach turned out to be calorie tracking, strength training, and protein-focused meals to lose fat while maintaining or gaining muscle — not endless crunches.
0:00 – 4:47 How “Spot Reduction” Works
4:48 – 10:10 Phase 1 Experiment
10:11 – 13:06 Phase 1 Results
13:07 – 20:24 Phase 2 Experiment
20:25 – Phase 2 Results
Click below to subscribe for more videos:

Hey guys! Just wanted to clarify a few questions (valid questions by the way) I'm seeing about the experiment design.
1. "Why did we do cardio before the ab training, rather than after?"
Honestly I considered doing it in that order (cardio after abs, not before), because based on the proposed mechanism that makes more sense. The reason I didn't is because I wanted to replicate the previous spot reduction study (Brobakken study https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10680576/ ) as closely as possible, where they claimed their protocol actually worked. And in that study, they had participants do the cardio first, and the abs exercises afterwards. I'm not sure why they chose to do it that way, and they didn't mention why in the study, but I honestly don't think it would make a difference what order you do them in. Even if there was some truth to the theory/mechanism, the abs and cardio are still done in the same session immediately after one another so it likely wouldn't really matter. It's more important that there's an actual aerobic component in that same workout. I had quite a few back and forth chats with other researchers, and they all recommended just to replicate the order used in the study it actually worked in.
2. "Why didn't we control for diet?"
Pretty much the same answer as #1. We wanted to replicate the original study design. Also, if we added a calorie deficit and maintained that same deficit in phase 1 and 2 , that now muddies the variables a little more. Of course we'd expect more fat loss (at least in Dennis' case) if we forced the deficit in phase 1, but that could also affect the fat distribution results we'd see in phase 2 (e.g. if someone diets for 30 days, then another 30 days, perhaps the body prioritizes more fat from different areas because they are now leaner or have less to lose from certain places). So again, just wanted to follow the original study as best as possible, where they stated "All subjects were instructed to abstain from dietary changes throughout the duration of this study."
3. "Why didn't we test an extra month combining diet + weights+ cardio + abs?"
I considered it. But based on the results of phase 1, I don't think it would be worthwhile. I think the cardio could help a little bit with the deficit, and the abs training would help maintain/grow the abs more and potentially would deliver the best results. But, it wouldn't really provide anything further in terms of answering the spot reduction question I was mainly concerned about.
Hope this clears a few things up!
But as you saw with Phase 2, diet is everything. And if you need some help with your diet and training, try out 2 weeks free of our BWS+ app: https://bws.plus/18a . It'll coach you every single week and take care of all the guess work for you.
Cheers!! And comment below what you'd like to see us test next!
Dennis? Ltt Dennis? No wayyyyyyy, that's awesome.
6:36 i will see that in my nightmare. Did you really need to put that?
3:35 That jogging form is wicked
I don’t if if I Sleep Bad – I wish when I do t Sleep I eat 10x
If you need AI to eat well, you’re a moron!!
The MRI machine to measure has been the best thing to happen to this channel
thx for the written conclusion 🙂 saved me a lot of time. precious these days 🧡
Must the test subjects be so skinny?
Not a fan of the title for this video, considering that targeted fat loss is, and continues to be, a myth. It is not possible as far as any currently published study has tested this hypothesis.
i want you to study me, i really want a natural, nice looking, but mostly, healthy, effective, and a well-cared for body
😂 I want to participate to the next study.
Buuuut, what if they did diet + weight training + ab exercises + cardio :=????
Wait, they didn't control for diet in the first phase??
So dennis left LTT & joined here? 🤔
clickbait at its finest
Is that Dennis from Linus Tech Tips?
In short, targeting fat directly DOESN'T work better than stuff we know already: calorie deficit prioritizing protein intake, with strength training.
The most problematic thing is reaching my daily calories. i just can't eat that much at all. like i'm 80 kgs (176lbs). That's 2112 calories for me. I can barely reach 1700 calories…
Anyone here know about dennis’ stint at ltt?😂 went like: holdon wait a minute
15:06 "i don't want to go to bed hungry" Jeremy, can you look into something for me? i'm pretty sure if you stick to an eating time (like you only eat between the hours of X and Y, or you only eat twice a day, or only eat after a workout or something) that your body gets used to these times, and you can basically train your body to not bother you with hunger until one of these trained but consistent triggers shows up.
i say this because when i go to work, i don't eat before, or during. and it can be hours apart and hours in variance, but i don't get my body bothering me about hunger.
can i marry vicky?
Having people with no real visible belly fat for this experiment is crazy. Personally id like to have their belly size BEFORE the training.
Man being shredded is so tedious I'm out ✌️😅
can i target thigh fat? my thighs are thick as hell
Clickbait
this was really helpful im going to try this hopefully reduce by body fat % by christmas but idk what it is, its not too high but i want to reduce it to improve my swimming.
Dennis from LTT?
Just goes to show you that the decades old adage "abs are made in the kitchen" wasn't ever bull shit
19:50 You can see her change just in the shoulders
Note that "lean mass" is all non-fat, including… Carbs and water
The shade on his dad 😂😂😂
You can not target just one area like belly fat. The body doesn’t work that way. Anyone claiming that a exercise, pill, a drink or anything is pushing false information
Why are these videos so fucking long!
this has always worked for me…..i have done hanging leg raises alone for a very longtime and i eat BS but my abs always show
This agrees with many older studies. However remember this wasnt anywhere close to scientific. The sample group was tiny, there was no control group, and not only was the expirement not blind for either party, the expirementor expressed bias in front of the participants. Basically it means nothing.
I was so lean, then last december i started baking and thrn came hospital and stuff… August 2026… Back at where i started in may 2023
I can’t imagine is Denis from Linus technik tips 1:15 😂🎉
Can I be your next guinea pig?🙏🏽🥹
If spot reduction is trash, then evolution is questionable. Law of use. The part you focus on using more, seems to see higher changes.
Can this be done by 13-18 year olds
Too slow, I'll stick with fasting.
I thought i was watching LMG for a second :3
What app is used to track calories ?
Fleee undorito gusztustalan
I really want to burn fat in my belly, not my cheek or my hips. But, everytime i do it, it always target my cheek and my hips first. I already tried to use corsette. But, still fail. 😭
Would bloating be a factor in any of this? I understand the mri tracks body fat specifically but im wondering whether bloating would make a difference in visible weight